<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Does Podbean Look So Familiar?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/why-does-podbean-look-so-familiar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/why-does-podbean-look-so-familiar/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:21:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/why-does-podbean-look-so-familiar/comment-page-1/#comment-27010</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 05:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/why-does-podbean-look-so-familiar/#comment-27010</guid>
		<description>Yes, yes, yes! Podbean is very smart, they took a WPMu installation, tricked it out, and gave everyone their own publishing platform for podcasts, brilliant.

Why can&#039;t we do the same for a CMS/LMS? Well, we can and we will damn it!

Thanks for showing the way forward. Open Source Publishing Platforms--where publishing means a whole lot more than text!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, yes, yes! Podbean is very smart, they took a WPMu installation, tricked it out, and gave everyone their own publishing platform for podcasts, brilliant.</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t we do the same for a CMS/LMS? Well, we can and we will damn it!</p>
<p>Thanks for showing the way forward. Open Source Publishing Platforms&#8211;where publishing means a whole lot more than text!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

