Who Is Jon Udell and Why Is He Following Me?
Posted by Andy Rush on 21 Oct 2007 at 10:27 pm | Tagged as: Friends & Colleagues, twitter
This is actually pretty funny. I am now presented with yet another chance to have fun at Jon Udell’s expense. First, some background. Many of you know, we were honored to have Jon talk at our Faculty Academy ‘06 edition. We were quadruplely (???) honored when he had very kind words regarding the Teaching and Learning crew here at UMW. We continue to keep Jon in the "minds that inspire us" category. So imagine how tickled I was to see how persistent Jon was in trying to follow me on Twitter, as demonstrated by my Hotmail account (my Twitter email address of record). Sure looks like Jon is spamming me something awful. Well, truth be told, it’s actually Twitter not working right (how’s that possible
).
The other fact is that I recently discovered Jon was on Twitter more regularly. There was even this recent cryptic message from Jon that actually turned out to be a basis for a blog post. Jon being on Twitter is to me a good sign that it is an appropriate tool to be using in my work. I want to know what Jon is working on and Twitter gives me access to his and other great minds, including my colleagues here at UMW.
I direct messaged Jon on Twitter telling him that I would un-follow and then re-follow him to see it that fixed things. We’ll see, but Jon you should know, it’s an honor to be spammed by you!

![Elbow - One Day Like This: Video : Music video by Elbow performing One Day Like This: Videowith Craig Potter [Producer], Rigan Ledwidge [Video Director], Sally Humphries [Video Producer](C) 2008 Polydor Ltd. (UK) (Tags: Elbow One Day Like This Alternative Fiction Craig Potter [Producer] Rigan Ledwidge [Video Director] Sally Humphries Producer]) (379037 views, rated 4.58)](http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/hooPU2mdsH4/default.jpg)


That “switched-on technologist” from UMW is at it again.
“Jon you should know, it’s an honor to be spammed by you!”
My pleasure
I was surprised to find that such a basic function would be randomly but stubbornly broken for certain pairwise relationships and not others. So I banged on it quite a bit.
I guess, actually, that in view of the shard architecture of these social databases, I shouldn’t have been so surprised.