Comments on: Uh Oh Flickr, Here Comes SnagIt! http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/uh-oh-flickr-here-comes-snagit/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:21:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Betsy Weber http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/uh-oh-flickr-here-comes-snagit/comment-page-1/#comment-1339 Betsy Weber Sat, 03 Jun 2006 15:49:06 +0000 http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/?p=164#comment-1339 I'm from TechSmith and I wanted to chime in. We've done everything in accordance with Flick's policies and worked wtih them. If they change their policies, we're happy to comply. Drop me a line if you'd like to chat more. Betsy I’m from TechSmith and I wanted to chime in.

We’ve done everything in accordance with Flick’s policies and worked wtih them. If they change their policies, we’re happy to comply.

Drop me a line if you’d like to chat more.

Betsy

]]> By: Tao Takashi http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/uh-oh-flickr-here-comes-snagit/comment-page-1/#comment-1281 Tao Takashi Tue, 30 May 2006 13:42:28 +0000 http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/?p=164#comment-1281 Well, one won't get banned for uploading non-photos, they just don't show up in public searches. The reason for this (as I understand it) to hold the flickr brand together for being a _photo_ site. You can still use them, link to your photostream, use local searched, do a group with them, etc. As they said 6 months ago they are working on maybe marking photos as non-photo (maybe to create some separate search for them) but for now they only have the NIPSA-tool for that. (I also do understand that people might not want all kinds of non-photographic stuff when searching for something.) I have a problem with that myself but that's what I understand from the forums. So for now I need to decide whether to get pro or not or maybe search for some other hoster. Not sure what to do now as I also don't know when (if ever) flickr might change it's tools and thus it's policy. But regarding SnagIt I doubt that they are doing something bad here. People just need to be aware that their photos might not searchable (unless it's just a minority of their photostream). Well, one won’t get banned for uploading non-photos, they just don’t show up in public searches. The reason for this (as I understand it) to hold the flickr brand together for being a _photo_ site. You can still use them, link to your photostream, use local searched, do a group with them, etc.
As they said 6 months ago they are working on maybe marking photos as non-photo (maybe to create some separate search for them) but for now they only have the NIPSA-tool for that.
(I also do understand that people might not want all kinds of non-photographic stuff when searching for something.)

I have a problem with that myself but that’s what I understand from the forums. So for now I need to decide whether to get pro or not or maybe search for some other hoster. Not sure what to do now as I also don’t know when (if ever) flickr might change it’s tools and thus it’s policy.

But regarding SnagIt I doubt that they are doing something bad here. People just need to be aware that their photos might not searchable (unless it’s just a minority of their photostream).

]]> By: Gardner http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/uh-oh-flickr-here-comes-snagit/comment-page-1/#comment-1274 Gardner Mon, 29 May 2006 10:47:00 +0000 http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/?p=164#comment-1274 Fascinating. I can't believe the Flickr policy will survive much longer. They might as well be requiring that all photos be taken with film cameras instead of digital ones. Fascinating. I can’t believe the Flickr policy will survive much longer. They might as well be requiring that all photos be taken with film cameras instead of digital ones.

]]>