<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If h.264 was a snake, it would&#8217;ve bit me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/if-h264-was-a-snake-it-wouldve-bit-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/if-h264-was-a-snake-it-wouldve-bit-me/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:27:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Rush</title>
		<link>http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/if-h264-was-a-snake-it-wouldve-bit-me/comment-page-1/#comment-59342</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Rush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/if-h264-was-a-snake-it-wouldve-bit-me/#comment-59342</guid>
		<description>Chris, I have not tried it myself but I wouldn&#039;t be shocked that it doesn&#039;t support it, based on what the wordtube plugin website says. The player looks to be based on the JW FLV player, so I&#039;m not sure why there isn&#039;t native support. Maybe a note to Alex Rabe, the creator would produce some useful info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I have not tried it myself but I wouldn&#8217;t be shocked that it doesn&#8217;t support it, based on what the wordtube plugin website says. The player looks to be based on the JW FLV player, so I&#8217;m not sure why there isn&#8217;t native support. Maybe a note to Alex Rabe, the creator would produce some useful info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/if-h264-was-a-snake-it-wouldve-bit-me/comment-page-1/#comment-59224</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/if-h264-was-a-snake-it-wouldve-bit-me/#comment-59224</guid>
		<description>So, wordtube was not your thing... but it is mine, That is cool. I need the playlist functionality. would you happen to know off hand if wordtube plays back h.264/mp4 stuff? I am having trouble with it, and was wondering if i am just missing some javascript file, or if the plugin just won&#039;t work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, wordtube was not your thing&#8230; but it is mine, That is cool. I need the playlist functionality. would you happen to know off hand if wordtube plays back h.264/mp4 stuff? I am having trouble with it, and was wondering if i am just missing some javascript file, or if the plugin just won&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UMW New Media Center &#187; What is HD video? Even Mark Cuban gets it wrong</title>
		<link>http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/if-h264-was-a-snake-it-wouldve-bit-me/comment-page-1/#comment-58256</link>
		<dc:creator>UMW New Media Center &#187; What is HD video? Even Mark Cuban gets it wrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/if-h264-was-a-snake-it-wouldve-bit-me/#comment-58256</guid>
		<description>[...] are, 1280&#215;720 pixels (again 720p), h.264 video codec, AAC audio. It&#8217;s video quality that I&#8217;ve raved about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are, 1280&#215;720 pixels (again 720p), h.264 video codec, AAC audio. It&#8217;s video quality that I&#8217;ve raved about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/if-h264-was-a-snake-it-wouldve-bit-me/comment-page-1/#comment-54833</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/if-h264-was-a-snake-it-wouldve-bit-me/#comment-54833</guid>
		<description>I think H.264 is a fantastic video codec. Its been greatest till now

still if any body wants to know its pros &amp; cons. may be one can look at

http://videocodecs.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think H.264 is a fantastic video codec. Its been greatest till now</p>
<p>still if any body wants to know its pros &amp; cons. may be one can look at</p>
<p><a href="http://videocodecs.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://videocodecs.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anand</title>
		<link>http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/if-h264-was-a-snake-it-wouldve-bit-me/comment-page-1/#comment-50672</link>
		<dc:creator>Anand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/if-h264-was-a-snake-it-wouldve-bit-me/#comment-50672</guid>
		<description>h.264 provides alot of opportunities online. I am having trouble finding editors that support it, however (I use Premiere- they have a plugin, but it costs $250 from another vendor). I think the new Vegas and Roxio edit h.264. Know of any others? Looking forward to trying this out on umwblogs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>h.264 provides alot of opportunities online. I am having trouble finding editors that support it, however (I use Premiere- they have a plugin, but it costs $250 from another vendor). I think the new Vegas and Roxio edit h.264. Know of any others? Looking forward to trying this out on umwblogs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faculty Academy Videos, or the beauty of our New Media Specialist at bavatuesdays</title>
		<link>http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/if-h264-was-a-snake-it-wouldve-bit-me/comment-page-1/#comment-50364</link>
		<dc:creator>Faculty Academy Videos, or the beauty of our New Media Specialist at bavatuesdays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 06:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/if-h264-was-a-snake-it-wouldve-bit-me/#comment-50364</guid>
		<description>[...] the Faculty Academy blog here. (Keep in mind he is using the high-powered h.264 codec he explains here for extremely high resolution&#8211;another element of how new media was the star this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Faculty Academy blog here. (Keep in mind he is using the high-powered h.264 codec he explains here for extremely high resolution&#8211;another element of how new media was the star this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aff</title>
		<link>http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/if-h264-was-a-snake-it-wouldve-bit-me/comment-page-1/#comment-42984</link>
		<dc:creator>aff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/if-h264-was-a-snake-it-wouldve-bit-me/#comment-42984</guid>
		<description>..it results in a high quality picture in a smaller file size.

Well, not quite. I think correct way of putting that is that h264 gives smaller filesize at the same quality that of the other codecs, but better quality of picture and about same size of file if bitrate etc. are the same as other codecs&#039;.

That is, it is not necesserily so that quality is better than mpeg2 etc. and filesize is smaller at the same time, though it could be if proper encoding settings and so forth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..it results in a high quality picture in a smaller file size.</p>
<p>Well, not quite. I think correct way of putting that is that h264 gives smaller filesize at the same quality that of the other codecs, but better quality of picture and about same size of file if bitrate etc. are the same as other codecs&#8217;.</p>
<p>That is, it is not necesserily so that quality is better than mpeg2 etc. and filesize is smaller at the same time, though it could be if proper encoding settings and so forth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
