<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr is to video, as Twitter is to . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/flickr-is-to-video-as-twitter-is-to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/flickr-is-to-video-as-twitter-is-to/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:21:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: D'Arcy Norman</title>
		<link>http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/flickr-is-to-video-as-twitter-is-to/comment-page-1/#comment-42171</link>
		<dc:creator>D'Arcy Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 03:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/flickr-is-to-video-as-twitter-is-to/#comment-42171</guid>
		<description>pfffffffffft :-)

yeah. I guess it&#039;s just a different medium than YouTube or Google Video. Even YouTube limits videos to 10 minutes in length, so arbitrary limits are nothing new...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pfffffffffft <img src='http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>yeah. I guess it&#8217;s just a different medium than YouTube or Google Video. Even YouTube limits videos to 10 minutes in length, so arbitrary limits are nothing new&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

