<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DivX Has Landed!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/divx-has-landed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/divx-has-landed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:21:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: In This Corner . . . Stage 6 &#8212; And He Blogs Archive</title>
		<link>http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/divx-has-landed/comment-page-1/#comment-2424</link>
		<dc:creator>In This Corner . . . Stage 6 &#8212; And He Blogs Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/?p=119#comment-2424</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve touted DivX in the past, and you can&#8217;t go very long without hearing someone mention YouTube this or that. Well, for a while now, DivX has had a YouTube-like site called Stage 6, where they feature videos that are presented in the DivX format (you&#8217;ll need the DivX web player to see them). YouTube has not been short on content worth watching, though original content is not necessarily their forte. The Stage 6 site, while not nearly a YouTube, offers up an original film called In This Corner. It&#8217;s a short film set in the year 1988 and while maybe not Oscar-worthy, it does have a good combination of humor, suspense, and triumph, enough to make it well worth your time (did I also mention teenage angst and Nintendo). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve touted DivX in the past, and you can&#8217;t go very long without hearing someone mention YouTube this or that. Well, for a while now, DivX has had a YouTube-like site called Stage 6, where they feature videos that are presented in the DivX format (you&#8217;ll need the DivX web player to see them). YouTube has not been short on content worth watching, though original content is not necessarily their forte. The Stage 6 site, while not nearly a YouTube, offers up an original film called In This Corner. It&#8217;s a short film set in the year 1988 and while maybe not Oscar-worthy, it does have a good combination of humor, suspense, and triumph, enough to make it well worth your time (did I also mention teenage angst and Nintendo). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gardner</title>
		<link>http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/divx-has-landed/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 14:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/?p=119#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Well, this is interesting. I knew about the Google deal but I didn&#039;t know DivX was involved. I agree with you on scale: this could be huge.

On my 3mb connection / 2.4 Ghz PC at home, the SD video came in very quickly and played back without a hitch. The HD video took longer to buffer, but it was still much faster than I&#039;d expected. Playback had one stutter, and I think I saw a few dropped frames but in general it was dazzling. I did have to crank my display setting to 1280x1024 to get all of the &quot;Shark Tale&quot; frame in there. Looked great on my 19&quot; CRT, though my desktop icons are now quite small. :-)

Thanks for blogging this. It&#039;ll be interesting to see if this development eventually drives the standard desktop display setting upward from the XGA level. I&#039;m betting it will, and that will have ramifications for web page design too....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is interesting. I knew about the Google deal but I didn&#8217;t know DivX was involved. I agree with you on scale: this could be huge.</p>
<p>On my 3mb connection / 2.4 Ghz PC at home, the SD video came in very quickly and played back without a hitch. The HD video took longer to buffer, but it was still much faster than I&#8217;d expected. Playback had one stutter, and I think I saw a few dropped frames but in general it was dazzling. I did have to crank my display setting to 1280&#215;1024 to get all of the &#8220;Shark Tale&#8221; frame in there. Looked great on my 19&#8243; CRT, though my desktop icons are now quite small. <img src='http://andheblogs.andyrush.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for blogging this. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see if this development eventually drives the standard desktop display setting upward from the XGA level. I&#8217;m betting it will, and that will have ramifications for web page design too&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

